Categories
Aural Cultures

Exploring The Audio Paper Manifesto Using Examples

I’ve had a deep dive into the web magazine, Seismograf and its special issue Fluid Sounds to clarify the definition of an audio paper. From what I’ve gathered, it is a fairly new medium that attempts to transcend conditioned notions of presentation and information access, specifically through sonic exploration and dissemination. It is unconventional in nature, not limited by an objective aesthetic or format and should serve as, not only a reflection of the topic at hand, but a “reflection of the reflection itself, that involves the process of knowledge production, presentation and representation” ( ). An experimental platform that extends the written academic text via audio production.

My key takeaways from the magazine’s manifesto are:

1. The audio paper affords performative aesthetics.

  • It has the potential to assemble heterogeneous and segregated knowledge disciplines. For instance, it combines the rationality of language and speech with the sensation and affective materiality of the voice, or it incorporates the sound aesthetics of various environments, landscapes and spaces to underline and strengthen the academic argument
  • It Incorporates the sound aesthetics of various environments, landscapes & spaces to underline and strengthen the academic argument.
  • Performative aesthetics are used to develop a means of expression.
  • Sounds and soundscapes become frameworks in which language performs
  • The situational context of aesthetics, materiality, tone, timbre, rhythm and physicality support the narration or operate on their own, in contradiction to the presented statements and arguments
  • Performative aesthetics recognise representation and presentation. That is, the relation between semantics and the mediation of dramaturgical elements (the performative gesture)

2. The audio paper is idiosyncratic.

  • It investigates environments –  the social, the material and the sensorial – by taking several dynamics of the perceptual and analytical process into account.
  • Our respective, individual and sensory idiosyncrasies are always at the core of our methodologies, but here this is emphasised through the mediation of sensory and non-sensory research.

P. Oliveira’s audio paper, ‘The New Amagerkaner’ is a sound ethnography of the fictional island of Amager’s urban and social development set in an imagined future. “Due to its speculative nature, the delivery of the paper assumes a storytelling format, in which (half) imaginary auditory worlds and speculative devices are presented to the listener as if already part of a distant past.” Through this the discourse and reflection investigates how listening devices might be deployed as tools for subversion and political resistance.

Here we see an example of listening as an epistemic practice. By listening back on these ‘auditory ghosts’ we are invited to take part in a research process that uses Amager as a case study. Oliveira’s mediation of academic discourse and sonic fiction to reflect on current and future technological articulations and listening strategies is idiosyncratic by nature. She brings her own aesthetic peculiarities and inventions to transmit her findings and propositions, using expanded sensibilities and provoking new situated events.

3. The audio paper is situated and partial.

  • Site specificity as a tool for research and presentation.
  • Situated implies that the sound work is composed with sound from the environments from which they engage.
  • Situated and partial knowledge also implies that the production is restricted by its means of production: technologies, tools, media, places and contexts.
  • The audio paper draws attention to the knowledge situation by, for instance, reflecting on the means of production.

This is particularly evident in A. Baixinho and T. Blom’s audio paper ‘Mountain meets urban waterfront’. By combining field recordings from Hallingskarvet mountain and an urban waterfront atmosphere, with the site-specific real-time sounds of Islands Brygge, they explore how the pre-existing aural environment integrates with the invading sonic composition. An experiment in sounds as place-making. There is no escaping the situational limitations of the soundscapes used. However, when combined a new perspective is created, and differences both merge and become known.

4. The audio paper evokes affects and sensations.

  • Feelings and sensations are present in the audio paper and work side by side with the semantics of language and sound.
  • The aesthetic, material aspects of the audio paper produce affects and sensations in the listener.
  • sonic materiality induces presence.
  • The relation between cognitive reason and bodily sensations.
  • It does not represent lived processes so much as it participates in actively shaping processes.
  • Academic knowledge that is felt and processed temporally.

The audio paper ‘Hearing on the verge: cuing and aligning with the movement of the audible’ is a clear representative of temporal experience. We are engaged by listening to another’s movement. We are transported from our, perhaps, present mundane sensory affectations, and transported to a different sonic context. We explore the semantics of listening in movement here, through both academic reflection and bodily sensation. Our engagement is intensified and given a different dimension. An expanded mode of listening across space-time and across situated milieu of hearing.

5. The audio paper is multifocal; it assembles diverse and often heterogeneous voices.

  • It is not necessarily narrated from the perspective of a one dimensional protagonist.
  • Research questions and arguments are developed within academic frameworks, while the presentation can take various forms.
  • Dramaturgical complexities that not only function as a representational and performative tool but also integrates the overall academic argument in the representation itself.

We see this in the A. Führer’s audio paper called The Map is Not The Territory D’Or; a score for a soundwalk in the town of Roskilde, Denmark. He not only relies on his narration, but also incorporates other sound materials, these being 1) an interview in Danish with the artist, 2) a voice over of a theoretical text in English, and 3) recordings from performances of the piece, including walking, breathing exercises, and the sounds of ventilation systems and other environmental sound. “The paper does not offer a hermeneutic interpretation of Führer’s piece; rather it is a performative appropriation that uses the piece as a machine for experimenting with the relations between artist and theorist, artwork, embodied experience and academic representation, all of which are categories rendered somewhat problematic by the format of the audio paper itself.”

6. The audio paper has multiple protagonists, narrators and material agencies.

  • Not limited to narrations performed by human beings
  • Landscapes, objects, technologies and politics are rendered active agents.

This can be seen in ‘Mountain meets urban waterfront’, where the contents of the soundscapes themselves do most of the storytelling.

7. The audio paper brings aesthetics and technology together in mediation.

  • With reference to Bruno Latour (1999), Chris Salter explains it this way: “Technology does something in and to the world by modifying existing relations and constructing new ones between humans, tools, processes and the environment in which all are deeply entangled.
  • This frame of understanding underlines the awareness that recording equipment, filtering, mixing, mastering and conversions are not neutral processes and tools. They are in themselves expressions of various actors and aesthetic means. 

8. The audio paper is a constituent part of broader ecologies.

  • It depends on diverse sound environments and human practices in its attempt to assemble aspects, narratives, phenomena and sensations of the world.
  • Always incorporates an awareness of the process of research and technological production
  • It not only reflects its own research question/s, but reflects the reflection itself: the process of knowledge production, the presentation and representation of language and voice, the narrative and dramaturgy, and the aesthetics of sound.

The elements required to bring a research paper alive with sound invite the narrator/ creator to choose carefully how these elements portray the information as there should be a constant awareness of aesthetics, both personal and impersonal.

Reflection

I find the aural papers offered by Seismograf in ‘Fluid Sounds’ intriguing and thought-provoking. They challenge our conditioning to only receive information and ask us to interact with and experience sources of knowledge in a different way. However, the avant garde nature of these papers strikes me as potentially inaccessible to those unfamiliar with the sound arts canon. Some questions that remain are: Does the current definition of an aural paper extend to topics that, not only analyse the nature of sound, in of itself, but use sound to explore other mediums? Where do we draw the line between an aural paper and a podcast. Does a podcast with performative aesthetics count as an aural paper, and is self-referential awareness always necessary. While Seimsograf’s manifesto is very in depth, I am still a little confused as to the where one might draw the line between between an audio paper and other similar sonic mediums. Nevertheless, the encouragement of performativity and personal aesthetic excites me as a means to step outside of conventional boxes with my final project, using syntax, tempo, time, voice, sound and music to express my research question.

Auditory evidence can include, but is not limited to:

  • Experimental sound pieces
  • Soundscape compositions
  • Narrative podcasts and other radio formats
  • Performance lectures
  • Aural poetry

Categories
Aural Cultures Personal/ Relevant

Sound Matters – The Sound Of Life Itself (Reflection)

Sound Matters, a playlist of audio papers written and produced by Tim Hitman and supported by Bang and Olufsen, starts with an episode called ‘The Sound of Life Itself’.

(‘Bang & Olufsen presents Sound Matters: a series of podcasts looking at – and listening to – all the sounds of the world around us. Forthcoming instalments will investigate all kinds of sounds that happen in our noisy cosmos, how we listen to them, the stories we tell about them, and all the ideas, inventions, discoveries, possibilities and ideas that live in the realm of the audible. Written and produced by Tim Hinman and supported by Bang & Olufsen.‘)

The sonic episode, decorated with field recordings and quiet ambient music, seamlessly intertwines the presenter’s voice with pre-recorded material whilst keeping the narrative singular and cohesive. To start with, Tim Hinman cleverly sets the scene… ‘the snow all around me, at the edge of a patch of pine trees’ (somewhere in a forest in Sweden)… ‘looking for some peace and quiet’. He goes on to give some context to the scene, explaining why he’s taken these recordings – As someone that’s worked in the sound industry for around 20 years his aim was to find some sort of ‘audio ground zero’ to find out where listening begins. All of this pretexts the actual podcast, that commences with the series’ ident ‘Sound Matters’. A poetic way of setting the audience up for an exploration into how humans fit into the big picture of sound – the soundscape of planet earth.

Over a recording of Wolves in the Algonquin provincial park in Canada, Bernie Krauss, the creator of said recording and participant of episode 1’s podcast, introduces himself as a Bio-acoustician who records all forms of nature and organisms of all sizes from viruses to large whales. Starting off as a musician, he went on to work on many film scores – most famously on Francis Ford Coppola’s ‘Apocalypse Now’. We are offered an insight into Bernie Krauss’ journey in the sound industry – from musician to field recordings.

Krauss’ references to Geophony: ‘referring to the sounds of natural forces, such as water, wind, and thunder, occurring in wild, relatively undisturbed habitats‘, Biophony: ‘referring to the collective acoustic signatures generated by all sound-producing organisms in a given habitat at a given moment.’ and Anthropophony: ‘representing human generated sound from either humans, themselves, or the electro-mechanical technologies they employ’ were all accompanied with soundscapes that sonically described what area of life each definition stood for. The episode even broke down a cityscape to reveal the layers of noise found within, linking it to how industrialisation has erased our connection with the natural soundscape. The podcast deftly expands on this by fading a soundscape of a city into a soundscape of nature to portray the differences in noise pollution and tranquility between the two, allowing the audience to aurally feel the difference as opposed to gauging it off mere text.

On a side note, a thought I found very enlightening was that natural sounds have no cultural bias, unlike many of the sounds made by humans, which is why they therefore induce sounds of tranquility and calmness, as there is no agenda or meaning we can attach to them other than their form and function.

This episode of the series Sound Matters aesthetically compares multiple soundscapes in a variety of ways. Like the sound of a plane flying overhead to introduces Krauss’ voice, which not only points to the matter at hand but also builds tension and a sense of urgency in the build up to the dialogue, or the frequent backing track of sonic environments that acts a constant reminder to the spaces within a landscape and the sounds that occupy them, and even the sound of silence to represent an ecosystem that is dead or close to dying, raising our awareness of the impact of noise on nature – man made noises can interfere with habitats and how the creatures within them hear, hunt and communicate.

Overall, I feel that the sonic imagery in this podcast accompanies Hinman’s and Krauss’ dialogue in a way that helps us visualise things, allowing us to engage even more with the information provided. Poignantly so, a podcast on the importance of sound in a very visual culture – setting the theme for the rest of the series

Categories
Creative Sound Projects

Group Collaboration – Anima

Discussions with my group on a potential theme for our collaborative project gave rise to a common interest in spirituality. The similarities between human and nature show synchronicities (a term coined by the psychologist Carl Jung ‘pertaining to the coincidental occurrence of events that seem related but are not explained by conventional mechanisms of causality’) between various forms of life. This led us to form a graphical design that combined the rings found in tree stumps and in human fingerprints. In essence, this shows a oneness or a unity in the physiological make up of humans and nature. The Gaia Hypothesis comes to mind here, that proposes that ‘living organisms interact with their inorganic surroundings on Earth to form a synergistic and self-regulating, complex system that helps to maintain and perpetuate the conditions for life on the planet.’

The anima, according to Carl Jung is one side of the collective consciousness, namely the feminine energy that radiates within us, whilst in traditional philosophy it is the subconscious part of an individual compared to the persona as ones perceived personality. Yet they all point to what I feel is the same thing. The soul. And in a widespread sense this can be interpreted as the energy shared by all living things. The term Anima immediately divides this energy into two parts, suggesting perhaps that duality is a necessity to existence. Yet ancient forms of thought such as Zen buddhism focus on a paradigm shift from mind-body dualism in order to exist without dichotomies. Whilst open to interpretation I believe that a centred existence may be achieved through reconnecting with our fellow humans and the natural world around us, using this interconnectedness to potentially realise the fragments within our own personalities.

Much of my research has used Musique Concrete as a central focus, and I feel this marries well with the ways in which we can achieve such a non duality. Particularly, the works of Pauline Oliveros and her sonic meditations come to mind. When we allow ourselves to succumb to the poetic chaos of our surroundings, we give ourselves the opportunity to respond in a way that originates from our primal inner beings, without forethought as to what ‘should’ be done due to conditioning and appropriations. Moreover, Musique Concrete not only encourages spontaneity but actively promotes us to engage with our environment in new ways. It seems as if the path of discovery, within sound and spirituality share many common attributes.

With ancient practices in mind, such as taoist meditation, zen buddhism and Gu Qin aesthetics I aim to create a sound piece that advocates healing through togetherness over a backdrop of sounds that we associate with tranquility, experimenting with them in ways that allow for freedom within music.

Categories
Creative Sound Projects Personal/ Relevant

Exploring Textures/ Ambience Using Paulstretch & Granulator

Considering the effect of sounds on our psychological wellbeing, both on a personal and universal level, I have set about myself the task of creating a soundscape, passing only sounds that are known as harsh to the human ear through Paulstretch and Granulator, in order to equip myself with a better understanding of how the sounds, tones and timbres chosen in compositions can illicit an emotional response within people, regardless of the musical content, whilst also familiarising myself with these devices.

Over elongated sounds of the screech of a chalkboard and the screams of someone in danger using spectral smoothing I passed discordant violins through the Granulator device, altering the nature of the sound source by changing the spray, volume envelope and grain size parameters. Furthermore, I used a high pitched sine wave to mimic the sound of tinnitus, gradually filtering out the harshness of it all with resonators, reverb and the Auto-filter. What results is an axis of sounds, starting with those that threaten, and ending with those that calm, demonstrating the effect sound has on our emotions.

Categories
Creative Sound Projects

The Psychology of Sound

Sound has always had a way of triggering various responses in human beings, whether that be fight or flight, a certain emotion or an extreme physical reaction. The associations we give certain sounds act as prompts, carrying information that activate our Reticular Activation System.

While some sounds can be linked to personal circumstances in ones life, stereotypically, many sounds will hold a universal meaning, such as the ring of a fire alarm or the sound of lightning. Yet, as people move through life and experience different things, these same sounds can trigger deep emotions based on the emotional information we associate them with as a result.

An example of this is the condition Misphonia, where exposure tio certain sounds can cause visceral reactions such as panic attacks, due to conditioning. In a general sense, sounds we find unpleasant, such as the scraping of cutlery, lies in the frequency of 2000 to 4000hz, the range that humans are most sensitive too. Evolutionary purposes suggest that sounds in this frequency range suggest a potential threat. Pleasurable sonic stimuli, such as music however, releases dopamines in our brains, bringing a level of internal euphoria via the episodic memories we attach to certain songs.

Despite conditioning, sounds affect us in similar ways, and in here lies the power to link people on a subconscious level.

Categories
Creative Sound Projects

Ruth Anderson & Meditation

Inspired by the sound piece I made in response to last weeks lecture surrounding the voice and sound manipulation, I continued to play with the way in which I could exhale, experimenting with staccato type exhalations, mindful breathing, throat exercises, sounding of vowels and nasal sounds. These experiments spurred me to research into sound art surrounding the breath, eventually leading me to Ruth Anderson’s piece ‘I Come Out Of Your Sleep’.

Taking Louis Bogan’s poem ‘Little Lobelia’, Ruth Anderson created a sound poem by elongating the vowels from the text in a ghostly fashion. These phonemes, whispered in a way that reminds me of modern day A.S.M.R, were intentionally voiced at a ‘very soft dynamic level’, just audible enough that they could perhaps go unnoticed if other environmental textures were present at the time of listening. This delicate delivery and curation of breath is reminiscent of haunting winds, yet soothing and sleep inducing at the same time. This minimal composition creates subtle melodic tones using the same techniques I have seen in other forms of Musique Concrete but also takes on the form of an almost meditative experience. What struck me as most interesting however, was her statement that her study of of Zen was “a natural extension of her music,” and that she had cited Pauline Oliveros and her Sonic Meditations as one of her main influences.

These findings have made me ponder on the relationship between musique concrete and meditation. I feel that Musique Concrete encourages the individual to be more aware of the possibilities in sound, extending to those one can make with the body, whilst meditation, dating back to its ancient forms, have always placed importance on the natural sounds around us, as well as self produced sounds for meditation, such as Tibetan throat singing. When the two are combined it can create opportunities to discover more in ways in which we can reconnect with our mind and body using creative practices.

Tuvan throat singing: an ancient vocal art, using circular breathing, that centres around the imitation of sounds in nature in order to connect with ones landscape.

References

DeLaurenti, Christopher. “Ruth Anderson: Uncaged Music – the Wire.” The Wire Magazine – Adventures in Modern Music, www.thewire.co.uk/in-writing/essays/ruth-anderson-uncaged-music. Accessed 16 Aug. 2021.

“Louise Bogan.” Wikipedia, 14 Feb. 2021, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louise_Bogan. Accessed 16 Aug. 2021.

“Ruth Anderson (Composer).” Wikipedia, 10 Aug. 2021, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Anderson_(composer). Accessed 16 Aug. 2021.

“Throat Singing: A Unique Vocalization from Three Cultures.” Smithsonian Folkways Recordings, folkways.si.edu/throat-singing-unique-vocalization-three-cultures/world/music/article/smithsonian.

Categories
Creative Sound Projects Personal/ Relevant

Sound Manipulation & Vocal Experiments

Following on from my research into Musique Concrete, I had a lecture on creative sound that focused on capturing the voice in interesting ways. By combining these recordings with sound manipulation devices and layering on Ableton, this allowed me to practically experiment with many of the ideas that Schaeffer’s work encompassed, working with several techniques, some of which I had used before, yet with a renewed mindset on the expansiveness of sound. With only an SM57 at hand I was limited to its cardioid nature, yet testing this in different ways gave me a greater understanding of its polar pattern’s reaction to distance and material when recording my voice.

Whilst Musique Concrete typically labels music as a byproduct of experimentation with sound, I decided to instead incorporate elements of it into a musical context, keeping melody and rhythm as the focus. Composing only using sounds from my vocal chords as the raw material, these experimentations directed my composition style in a different way to which I would normally approach it, resulting in surprisingly interesting musical products.

In the first instance I created the harmonical backbone by layering these recordings in an instrument rack, mapping each sound to various sections of midi keys. Changing the pitch, reversing the samples and mapping the volume and frequencies of specific layers in the rack to macros I automated these qualities with the intention of creating some level of musical cohesiveness. The random nature of these recordings meant that the rhythms produced were unlike much of the musical work I usually end up creating.

https://soundcloud.com/user-232356095/vocal-experiments

In the second instance I placed more importance on sound manipulation by using automation on the Sampler’ LFOs to oscillate the pitch of certain recordings, whilst also using the loop length and rate as mod destinations in order to also automate these. I used delay for further rhythmic content and warping, cutting and rearranging, and crossfading the recordings also helped glue the material together in a way that stayed true to my aesthetic principles.

https://soundcloud.com/user-232356095/vocal-experiments-week18-csp-02/s-H0ivC95tIUK

This has been a very insightful practical experience into how experimentation with sound can leave the creator somewhat at the mercy of their material’s properties, unassumingly leading them to exciting discoveries and new ideas.

Categories
Creative Sound Projects

Musique Concrete

The french composer Pierre Schafer, a pioneer of experimental music, was one of the first to recognise the limits of traditionally recorded music and theory. His experiments with recording equipment, but most notably tape manipulation, are the main ways in which he explored these limitations, pushing past boundaries of what was widely accepted in music, ushering in a new age of musical experimentation

Using tape recorders in a creative way, Schafer set about changing the nature of recorded sound that society had grown familiar with. Conventional techniques of music production used on the machines at his disposal, such as the Shellac record recorder, mixing desk and microphones didn’t allow for enough alteration of the tonal characteristics of the sounds he was using to satiate his experimental aesthetic. As a result he started to study the characteristics of instruments on a micro level, in order to alter them in a more complex fashion. His careful analysis of these characteristics, such as attack, timbre, decay and speed, among others, and the way in which they were applied in mainstream music allowed him to come up with ways to change the attributes of sound entirely. Using principles of loop manipulation, Schaeffer composed a piece between 1949 to 1950 called Symphonie Pour Un Homme Seul that was made up of music using turntables and mixers that allowed him to create a symphony of noises, incorporating these techniques of sound manipulation, such as reversing a sound, sustained resonance and removing the attack of a sound.

A demonstration of Musique Concrete

The introduction of the tape recorder in 1951 facilitated manipulation of sound via speed variation and looping in a much more intuitive way. However it was the possibility of tape splicing, whereby bits of tape could be cut up and rearranged that fuelled a lot of Schaeffer’s future work, as well as the advancement of music production in general.

These works with tape manipulation and application of audio effects formed the basis of Musique Concrete, ‘a type of musical composition that utilises recorded sounds as raw material‘ resulting in montages mainly using, but not limited to, the human voice, natural environment, musical instruments and synthesizers without the restrictions of music theory pertaining to melody, harmony, rhythm, etc. This form of acousmatic music, where the sound is manipulated enough so that the audience has little clues as to it source became fundamental in the development of the musical genres that followed.

An example of techniques of Musique Concrete used in popular music

Whilst a lot of his early works strike me as a concoction of sounds arranged in a very chaotic way with, what I deem to be, a lack of musical intent, upon research I now feel as if the experimental intention behind these works are more important than the resulting non-music, as it forces the audience to see sound from a new perspective. If it wasn’t for Schaeffer, much of the presupposed meaningless of his musical arrangements may never have merged with traditional music to create the vast array of genres we have today. In a very direct sense, one such genre is that of Plunderphonics: ‘a highly controversial genre of electronic music that involves unashamedly sampling other people’s music or media to create new tracks.

I feel that Musique concrete’s inherent opposition to traditional forms of music also encourages creators to engage more inquisitively with the environment they find themselves in and the tools at their disposal, to discover alternate ways of producing sound and motivating us to understand our tools in a greater way. It teaches an important lesson in exercising more wariness with the associations to music that we have been conditioned to relate to.

References

Palombini, Carlos. (2002). Musique Concrète Revisited.

“Acousmatic Sound.” Wikipedia, 3 Dec. 2020, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acousmatic_sound. Accessed 15 Aug. 2021.

Henshall, Marc. “The History of Musique Concrète.” Sound Matters, 30 Oct. 2011, www.yoursoundmatters.com/musiqueconcrete1/.

“Musique Concrete | Music 101.” Courses.lumenlearning.com, courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-musicapp-medieval-modern/chapter/musique-concrete/.

“Symphonie Pour Un Homme Seul.” Wikipedia, 9 Feb. 2021, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symphonie_pour_un_homme_seul. Accessed 15 Aug. 2021.

Wikipedia Contributors. “Musique Concrète.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 15 Nov. 2019, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musique_concr%C3%A8te.

Categories
Creative Sound Projects

Listening as Activism: The “Sonic Meditations” of Pauline Oliveros

During a time of political tension between America and Russia, namely the Cold war, where America’s struggle against the spread of communism saw an indirect confrontation between the two superpowers, there was a widespread sentiment of worry regarding the potential threat this conflict could have on the future.

Pauline Oliveros, a pioneer of electronic music in San Francisco at the time, responded to these events by turning inwards via ‘Sonic Meditations’ with a goal of unifying people with a ‘humanitarian purpose of expanded consciousness’ through text based scores born from experimental private compositions focused on soothing and relaxing the mind and body.

In order to reconnect with herself amidst the global despair, Oliveros’ experiments with extended drones on her accordion led her to form sound and body exercises that she coined ‘recipes for listening’, through which she emphasised the importance of listening actively, as opposed to passively, as a form of self healing. Translating these into textual scores, one example reads “Take a walk at night. Walk so silently that the bottoms of your feet become ears.”

These instructions, eventually compiled into what we now know as ‘Sonic Meditations’, seems to me like a renewed way of self reflection that focuses on listening as an active pursuit, whilst incorporating traditional forms of meditation such as breath-work and Gong baths. However, although her work is widely known to revolve around the phenomenon of deeper listening, I feel that Oliveros’ work with kinetic awareness blurs the line between sound and movement. Whilst her intentions may have initially revolved around intent listening, does the involvement of movement not distract the individual from focusing all their attention on the sounds they are submerged in? Her idea, however, to incorporate movement came from her encounters with Tai Chi, a practice that primarily focuses on self healing, and with this knowledge it can be said that multiple sensory forms are intertwined if the main purpose is to remedy oneself of inner tension.

The term ‘body-centered politics’ strikes me as a very poetic description of her work as it leaves us with the notion that in times of political misfortune one can retain some form of composure within themselves, using listening and movement as a form of activism.

Moreover, the ensembles she formed in order to act out these meditations gathered in non-verbal meetings. On many occasions I have experienced an exchange of energy and emotions with others where no words were needed, and in many ways this made these encounters all the more powerful. As a result, I understand Oliveros’ necessity to exclude forms of verbal communication in order to create an atmosphere of heightened states of awareness and sensitivity to one another on a feeling level. She emphasised that music is a byproduct of the activity of experimenting on the self and that without the pressure of being involved in a performer/ audience axis a safe space is created for non verbal communication between its participants.

I feel that the dichotomy of existing in a divided state can be remedied by unifying with others. A collective oneness can be achieved, and perhaps help centre the mind and the body. An example of this comes to mind, where I engaged in a political protest at trafalgar square. The act of chanting and kneeling with thousands of other like-minded people not only emphasised the gravity of the situation at hand but the power people have when uniting in a common cause, and as a result fed me strength and confidence in my own abilities as a human being. This can also be seen in one of Oliveros’ meditations ‘Teach me how to fly’ where participants were asked to hum in unison via careful observation of their individual breath and a consequent exhalation of sound. The title is a quirky reference to the fact that this group exercise can sound like an airplane taking off. A mighty prospect when alone, yet an easy task when we join with one another. Going back to the notion of increased sensitivity to our fellow humans, these shared experiences can manifest our individual inner experiences, paving the way for acceptance from others and most importantly, self acceptance. In 1974, Oliveros wrote, “How many of you out there think you are in the minority? If everyone came out of the closet the world would change overnight.

A lack of control over seemingly despairing situations can lead us to respond by using the tools at our immediate disposal to create a safe haven for self healing. As a result it frees us to discover alternate ways of knowing ourselves in a deeper way, overcoming mainstream societal restrictions on how one should listen or move based on class, gender or nationality and connect with others in order to move towards a more accepting civilisation. Perhaps the most effective way of advancing as a species is by looking inwards rather than searching outwards.

References

Laima. “Deep Listening: Discovering Pauline Oliveros’ Sonic World with Laima.” The Vinyl Factory, 1 Apr. 2021, thevinylfactory.com/features/discovering-pauline-oliveros-sonic-world-with-laima/.

O’Brien, Kerry. “Listening as Activism: The ‘Sonic Meditations’ of Pauline Oliveros.” The New Yorker, 2017, www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/listening-as-activism-the-sonic-meditations-of-pauline-oliveros.

Oliveros, Pauline. SONIC MEDITATIONS by Pauline Oliveros.

“The Vietnam War – the Cold War (1945–1989) – CVCE Website.” Cvce.eu, 2013, www.cvce.eu/en/education/unit-content/-/unit/55c09dcc-a9f2-45e9-b240-eaef64452cae/5ad21c97-4435-4fd0-89ff-b6bddf117bf4.

Categories
MIXOLOGY Personal/ Relevant

Envelop Plugins – 3 Dimensional Sound

While recording in Ambisonics has its benefits, using the open source audio production tools Envelop for Live allows one to create immersive sound in alternative ways.

Ambisonics audio, by nature, is a multichannel format. While Ableton, as of yet, is only equipped to use mono or stereo tracks, ambisonic files must be converted to an appropriate format before use, which can result in some loss of depth within the spatial image of the recording.

The Envelop for Live (E4L) devices allow us to extend the capabilities of Ableton, with the use of max for live, in order to create ambisonic audio within the DAW itself by working backwards. Instead of converting ambisonic files into usable stereo files for example, E4L’S devices allow us to convert these stereo files into ambisonic files.

Using the Source Panner Device, we are able to encode the audio source. It does this by positioning it in a 3 dimensional space, turning into an ambisonic signal, essentially working as a 3 dimensional panning device. Using a series of sends and returns we are then able to use the Master-buss device to decode the encoded audio, which is required for playback within Ableton.

Comparing this to the free Max for Live device, Surround Panner, that uses an XY control, similar to that of E4L’s Source Panner, to place audio anywhere in the surround field, I was confused as to what the difference was between the two, and what benefits the lengthier process required by E4L’s plugins to create a Surround Panner brought. Upon further research I have now realised that Ableton’s surround panner only allows one to create movement within a two-dimensional space as opposed to 3-dimensional that is enabled by the conversion to ambisonic with E4L’s plugins, giving way more depth the audio I have been working with.